Total Pageviews
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Helicopter Parents in the workplace
With this generation of baby boomers, parents are having much closer relationships with their children. Millennials are being "coddled" by their parents all throughout life, even through a main life achievement; obtaining a career. Parents are not only joining their children in interviews and company events, but are submitting resumes for their offspring as well. Some companies see this as having a potentially positive effect on the company as this could boost employee morale and create a better sense of comfort in the workplace. Others don't view these "helicopter" parents in the same light. They see them as intrusive on their children's lives. A mother kicks a baby bird out her nest so that it would learn to fly. Parents need to let go of their children and let them lead their adult lives. Adult offspring should take the initiative in finding jobs for themselves and excelling in them; without parental involvement.
MLA Citation
11.10.14
MLA
Citation
In
the British town of Rotherham, child sex abuse has quite a history.
There are currently 300,000 inhabitants of this town and out of those
300,000, there have been 1,400 reported cases of children being
sexually abused. This is over a period of 16 years, but there has
been widespread child sex abuse, and most cases started appearing in
1997. However, even outside of this town, there are hundreds of
additional cases of inappropriate behavior and abuse towards
children. The abuse varies from sexual to a whole other degree of
evil; being doused in petrol with the threat of being set alight.
There are children all over Britain who are and were previously
abused by predators of all ages and community figures. Still, before
the cases in Rotherham, there were over 100 cases of sexual abuse
connected to widely known and respected government officials. These
cases had disappeared from home offices, leading to thorough
investigations on what might have happened to them and recovering the
names of them. The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Children is not yet sure on the nature of the crime. In addition to
those investigations, police have arrested about 660 suspected
pedophiles during a six-month covert operation to find people
accessing indecent images of children online.
A
lot of the cases show signs of the abused being “groomed” by
their abusers. Grooming is when an offender begins to establish a
friendly relationship with their victim and get close to them over a
period of usually a few years. In this stage, they introduce the
children to alcohol and drugs, as well as beginning sexual
experiences. In most cases, the child trusts the person “grooming”
them, and doesn't see them as a figure doing something wrong. The
majority of the victims in Rotherham are young girls, yet there have
been reports of young boys as well; but those tend to be
“under-reported.” There has also been a pattern seen in the
sexual abuse. It has been identified as that a plethora of the
victims were white female children; and the abusers, of Asian
descent.
Because
of all of this going on under the Rotherham Borough Council and the
Rotherham Police, certain individuals have resigned and are also
trying to be driven to resignation. The council's leader, Roger
Stone, had immediately resigned when an independent report
commissioned by the Rotherham Council, and the unsent police and
crime commissioner, Shawn Wright, is being called for resignation by
The Labor Party.
Child
sex abuse is absolutely disgusting and horrifying. Rather, any abuse
to a child is simply mortifying. Children are innocent souls and they
shouldn't be violated by grown adults. In addition, the “art” of
grooming is especially mortifying as children begin to trust, and in
some cases love, these perpetrators. There are millions cases of
children being harassed in their daily lives, all over the world; not
only in Britain. The people who do this should definitely all be
caught – even though that is not likely – and rightly prosecuted.
Resources:
"Britain
Arrests 660 Suspected Paedophiles during Operation." ABC News.
N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Nov. 2014.
"Review
Fails to Find Missing Files on UK Child Sex Abuse." ABC News.
N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Nov. 2014.
Werth,
Christopher. "Reports on Child Sex Abuse Toils Britain."
Los Angeles Times 1 Sept. 2014: n. pag. Print.
Monday, November 3, 2014
(Florence Kelley) 2011 Question 2 "Excellent Parallelism"
Beginning even before the 1800's, children of extremely young ages were put at work. Once a child learned how to walk, his next step was to learn how to work. Over the years, certain states have made laws pertaining to child labor issues. Work days were around 12 hours, and without acceptable breaks. Yet, the laws that did pass, only helped to a specific extent. They provided that children before a precise age could only work until the hour deemed appropriate enough to stop. But the precise age was still of a child; still too young for the working conditions to be acceptable. The same thing went for women, They had the same issues as did the adolescents. Yes, women were adults so it wasn't nearly as horrifying as for children. A woman's body has significant differences compared to a man's. An example would be the death of an un-fertilized egg (menstruation). This happens to a woman once a month and lasts a week on average. For her hygiene to remain proper, she has to regularly access the restroom. A case in many factories is that these restroom breaks weren't permitted, and women had to proceed with their employee responsibilities while sitting in their own filth. However, these unpleasant working conditions could be fought for; and were. One woman who fought for child labor laws and improved conditions for working women was Florence Kelley. On July 22, 1905, she gave a speech before the convention of the National Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on the topics earlier presented. In this speech, she used rhetorical strategies, such as pathos, ethos, and logos to fully convey her message on child labor to her audience.
Pathos was used as she states descriptions of working environments of children in ways that could make a listener or reader feel a variety of emotion. "Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy." She begins her description with speaking of what others are doing while these young girls are so dutifully working. Millions are asleep, resting, in the warmth of their beds, in the comforts of their homes; compared to the several thousand little girls working in textile mills alone. And for what purpose are they at work in the hours of the day that most reserve for rest? They are creating items for others to go out and buy.
In a way similar to her using pathos for emotional appeal, Kelley uses ethos as ethical appeal. By the law of New Jersey, children are not to work in unappealing hours before the age of fourteen. However, the day they turn 14, they can now work 12 hour shifts; daily. "A little girl, on her thirteenth birthday, could start away from her home at half past five ... without violating any laws of the Commonwealth." This, Kelley used as an example of what the situation is in Pennsylvania. This little girl carries her midnight luncheon pail at the same time other workers carry their midday luncheon pails. She is ready to work in the mill for 12 hours, from 6 at night to 6 in the morning, with only a miniscule break. This appeals to a person's sense of morals as it gets them to think of whether or not this is an okay thing to be happening.
Lastly, Kelley conveys her message on child labor using logos; logical appeal. Is it logical to have children and women in terrible working conditions? "Until the mothers in the great industrial states are enfranchised, we shall none of us be able to free our consciences from participation in this great evil." With this, women as workers and mothers of children in inappropriate working conditions, they need a say in what's going on at work.
Pathos was used as she states descriptions of working environments of children in ways that could make a listener or reader feel a variety of emotion. "Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy." She begins her description with speaking of what others are doing while these young girls are so dutifully working. Millions are asleep, resting, in the warmth of their beds, in the comforts of their homes; compared to the several thousand little girls working in textile mills alone. And for what purpose are they at work in the hours of the day that most reserve for rest? They are creating items for others to go out and buy.
In a way similar to her using pathos for emotional appeal, Kelley uses ethos as ethical appeal. By the law of New Jersey, children are not to work in unappealing hours before the age of fourteen. However, the day they turn 14, they can now work 12 hour shifts; daily. "A little girl, on her thirteenth birthday, could start away from her home at half past five ... without violating any laws of the Commonwealth." This, Kelley used as an example of what the situation is in Pennsylvania. This little girl carries her midnight luncheon pail at the same time other workers carry their midday luncheon pails. She is ready to work in the mill for 12 hours, from 6 at night to 6 in the morning, with only a miniscule break. This appeals to a person's sense of morals as it gets them to think of whether or not this is an okay thing to be happening.
Lastly, Kelley conveys her message on child labor using logos; logical appeal. Is it logical to have children and women in terrible working conditions? "Until the mothers in the great industrial states are enfranchised, we shall none of us be able to free our consciences from participation in this great evil." With this, women as workers and mothers of children in inappropriate working conditions, they need a say in what's going on at work.
Joan Didion
Joan
Didion's opening paragraphs describe her knowledge of the Santa Ana
winds of California. Joan's view on the Santa Ana winds seems to be
negative and informative, even though she states that this occurrence
usually seems to create certain disturbances in the world. She conveys
this view using a fair amount of good diction, structure and selection
of detail.
Most
of the words that Joan uses to describe what a Santa Ana is, and what it
does, are seen to have been carefully selected by her. She uses words
that aren't normally seen or read by the public, as well as a translation
to another language. "The baby frets. The maid sulks." Her writing sounds
well composed, at this point, and further throughout the paragraph it
seems that Joan's looking negatively on the matter of a Santa Ana. She uses
the word "foehn", which means strong wind. She writes of fights, suicide,
nervousness, depression and more words with negative connotations that,
again, are showing a negative perspective. This is even more clearly seen
in the last few sentences; one in particular showing the change in the
ratio of positive to negative ions becoming "unusually high". Joan ends her
introductory paragraphs with, "in the simplest terms, is make people
unhappy which is what the high ratio of positive to negative ions means." With
this being said, you could only assume that the Santa Ana winds are not
appreciated or looked on happily and positively by the writer.
Joan's
structure of her paragraphs also helps with conveying her negative view
on a Santa Ana. Right off the bat, she writes of an "uneasy" tension
that is
physically felt by the people, as a whole, of Los Angeles. She says that
it is "impossible" for a Santa Ana to be predicted, but that is
not true in terms of what can be felt by the inhabitants of the
complicated city
of Los Angeles. The next paragraph continues as an anecdote Joan shares
of her first knowledge of a Santa Ana, when she had first moved to the
City of Angels. The bad effects of the winds were told to her by
neighbors, and she then had experienced them for herself. She follows
this paragraph, and ends with, one on all of the terrible aftermaths of a
Santa Ana and a foehn, with the main effect being, simply put,
happiness. As Joan
writes of the bad effects of a Santa Ana, with proceeding to worse and
ending with the worst effects, showing that these winds are
something that she doesn't view as pleasant and, therefore, negatively.
College Essay
AP
English Language
09.30.14
College
Essay
Many
students currently face the dilemma of whether or not going to a four
year college or university is worth the cost. In this day and age,
the price to go and attend a college or university continues to rise
at a steep incline. The current debate revolves around the reason
that the price you pay to attend college, in both time and money,
will be advantageous to you in your future. At first thought, it
would seem that going to college wasn't really worth it in the long
run. You spend thousands of dollars and quite a few years to get
“properly educated.” However, what good is this proper education?
Would it help in earning a job? “Now, with unemployment expected to
remain above 8% well into 2014, it will be many years before young
college graduates – or any workers – see substantial wage
growth.” (Chart) This would make one believe that college wasn't
worth the trouble. Nevertheless, earning a higher education, by
attending a four year college or university, is beneficial and worth
the energy and financial trouble.
Even
with unemployment rates on the rise in the United States and
elsewhere, most of the unemployed are without the earlier stated
“proper education”. “College graduates, though hardly immune
from the downturn, are also far less likely to be unemployed than
non- graduates.” (Leonhardt) This gives a glimpse of hope to
college graduates, showing that they have a higher rate of employment
than that of a mere high school graduate. Graduating from a college
also gives a person the chance of making more money than they would
have with a lesser education. (Pew) “Adults who graduated from a
four year college believe that, on average, they are earning $20,000
more a year as a result of having gotten that degree. Adults who did
not attend college believe that, on average, they are earning $20,000
less as a result. These matched estimates by the public are very
close to the median gap in annual earnings between a high school and
college graduate as reported by the US Census Bureau in 2010: $19,
550. A more detailed Pew Research Center analysis … shows that this
gap varies by type of degree and field of study.” This shows that
people with college degrees essentially earn a much higher income
than those without.
College
also offers you both intellectual growth and experience, rather than
just the intellectual growth that many would assume. Statistics show
that most four- year college graduates don't regret attending college
and view their experience as constructive. “Among survey
respondents who graduated from a four- year college, 74% say their
college education was very useful in helping them grow
intellectually...” (Pew) When applying for a real- world job,
employers look for certain skills as well as education levels in
their potential employees. Going to a four- year college or
university helps you obtain these certain skills. Be as it may, these
skills are not obtained through attending classes or courses. They
are gained from life experiences, and going to college is considered
a major life experience. You get to begin your maturity in the
ability to care for yourself and become responsible for your own
life. Graduating from a college helps you grow in intellect, work
ethic, and is, overall, valuable in leading a successful life.
Revised Locavore Essay
AP
English Language
27
October 2014
Locavore
Essay
The
locavore movement is becoming a widespread movement everywhere, with
people absolutely falling in love with the concept; and maybe even
the execution. However,
there are a few parts to it, that people don't necessarily realize or
think about; as to if and why becoming a locavore could be entirely
beneficial. One
can give many reasons as to how and why eating locally grown food is,
oh, so much greater, than the food you buy in the supermarket; that
had traveled thousands of miles. On the other hand, there are those
who believe that the nutrition difference is not as great as it
initially seems, there are other methods used for food production
that use a lot of energy and continue to leave a large carbon
footprint, and lastly, that not everyone lives within a local farm or
an area with good soil for farming, as the entire Earth isn't
made of rich soil.
“There
will be nutritional differences, but they'll be marginal.” (Source
B) A large part of the reason that people would choose to be a
locavore, is based on the thought that they
don't get a good supply from the foods that we eat compared to the
nutritional values of the locally grown foods that we could be
eating. According to Marion Nestle, a dietitian,
there might be nutritional differences , usually only if your
“local” soil is really great, they wouldn't be that distant.
Conforming to
her, “We're just not nutrient-deprived.” Another big idea of the
locavore movement is the thought of leaving a significantly smaller
carbon footprint by eating the food less traveled. Yet, there are
other “energy-hogging” factors in the production of food. (Source
C) “But New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon
footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced under intensive
factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint.” With this, it
is seen that the pastures that are local to you, aren't really
the best the best place for you to get food from
in terms of the wasted energy. There is also an issue regarding “food
miles”. With certain growers being able to supply more people,
further away, and with a higher supply of food; compared to another
grower with the less amount of produce and miles traveled. “The
critical measure here is not food miles but apples per gallon.”
Following those thoughts of locavore consumers, they don't
necessarily know about actually growing food in regard to processing
practices, water availability, packaging waste and fertilizer
application.
The
largest problem found with the locavore food industry has to do with
our current societies. “In the United States, 80 percent of us
live in large, densely-populated urban areas, usually on the coast,
and typically hundreds of miles, from the major centers of food
production.” (Source F)
How is it that the world can become relying on just what's near you
to get the food you need to survive, if you don't live near a place
of food production?
Barbara Ehenreich
Barbara Ehenreich has what appears to be, quite a strong opinion on television that goes back to the 1980's. The 1980's is when television was really brought out, and people began to watch. The shows on T.V. were written to entertain watchers, and so they did. The characters on the shows led similar lives to those watching, until, as Ehenreich points out, it was realized that that wasn't so. Television shows didn't have clips of people watching T.V. If in the televised world there are people who don't watch T.V. as we do, what's the point of watching? "So why do we keep on watching?" is Ehenreich's main focus. Well, why wouldn't we watch television just because it shows that watching television is boring? It isn't showing that watching television is boring, but that watching people stare a screen providing entertainment to others, isn't all that enjoyable. Yet, there are cases where it can be. In modern times, not the 1980's, there are, in fact, television shows, that receive immense praise; that follow, specifically, the lives of people who do watch a lot of television. Now, what is depicted there?
For a majority of the people, watching television is not boring. Yes, it might not be the most stimulating activity, but does it absolutely have to be? No, it doesn't, but it provides an escape to those in need, and a pleasing pastime for others. To this day, hundreds of shows are being produced, and no two shows are entirely identical. There is quite a large variety to choose from, based on what a certain person would find appealing and enjoy. Writers for shows are constantly brainstorming and incorporating new concepts for the purpose of administering a continuously improving source of entertainment.
However, there is one aspect to T.V. watching, as Ehenreich points out, that can be, to some, quite uneventful; the actual viewing of a show. Now there are those who watch an episode a day, and then others who view an entire season a day. In most casing of watching the tube, you sit and stare and really without much else going on. These people, are what Ehenreich so delicately dubs, "modern people; i.e. couch potatoes". She claims that these people only exist for the sole purpose of using a talking, light-up box for entertainment. They would never do anything that they watch so dutifully, simply due to the "fact" that they're lazy. Yet, television is watched by people with more "successful" lives that use it as a means of relaxation. For example, a doctor may watch a drama revolving around another, fictional, hospital, to get some comic relief on such a weighted duty. Teachers who spend countless hours in an attempt to educate the masses, need breaks; and watch television. There are shows on teachers and professors as well as shows following cops and even students. All of these different people do watch T.V. shows, possibly and especially those those that relate to them. It is simply ignorant to say that people who spend hours on watching television "do nothing that is ever shown on television (because it is either dangerous or would involve getting up from the couch)". What would Ehenreich then call these people, with jobs that require "getting up from the couch", that watch T.V. shows based on the same jobs? From her statements, these people are obviously just simply unheard of.
For a majority of the people, watching television is not boring. Yes, it might not be the most stimulating activity, but does it absolutely have to be? No, it doesn't, but it provides an escape to those in need, and a pleasing pastime for others. To this day, hundreds of shows are being produced, and no two shows are entirely identical. There is quite a large variety to choose from, based on what a certain person would find appealing and enjoy. Writers for shows are constantly brainstorming and incorporating new concepts for the purpose of administering a continuously improving source of entertainment.
However, there is one aspect to T.V. watching, as Ehenreich points out, that can be, to some, quite uneventful; the actual viewing of a show. Now there are those who watch an episode a day, and then others who view an entire season a day. In most casing of watching the tube, you sit and stare and really without much else going on. These people, are what Ehenreich so delicately dubs, "modern people; i.e. couch potatoes". She claims that these people only exist for the sole purpose of using a talking, light-up box for entertainment. They would never do anything that they watch so dutifully, simply due to the "fact" that they're lazy. Yet, television is watched by people with more "successful" lives that use it as a means of relaxation. For example, a doctor may watch a drama revolving around another, fictional, hospital, to get some comic relief on such a weighted duty. Teachers who spend countless hours in an attempt to educate the masses, need breaks; and watch television. There are shows on teachers and professors as well as shows following cops and even students. All of these different people do watch T.V. shows, possibly and especially those those that relate to them. It is simply ignorant to say that people who spend hours on watching television "do nothing that is ever shown on television (because it is either dangerous or would involve getting up from the couch)". What would Ehenreich then call these people, with jobs that require "getting up from the couch", that watch T.V. shows based on the same jobs? From her statements, these people are obviously just simply unheard of.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Locavore Essay Metacognitive Comments
AP English Language
27
October 2014
Locavore Essay
The locavore movement is becoming a
widespread movement everywhere, with people absolutely falling in love with the
concept; and maybe even the execution. [Unknown A1] However, there are a few parts to it, that people
don't necessarily realize or think about; that becoming a locavore is entirely
beneficial. One can give many reasons as to how and why eating locally grown
food is, oh, so much greater, than the food you buy in the supermarket; that
had traveled thousands of miles. On the other hand, there are those who believe
that the nutrition difference is not as great as it initially seems, there are
other methods used for food production that use a lot of energy and continue to
leave a large carbon footprint, and lastly, that not everyone lives within a
local farm or an area with good soil for farming, as the entire Earth [Unknown A2] is made of rich soil.
“There will be nutritional
differences, but they'll be marginal.” (Source B) A large part of the reason
that people would choose to be a locavore, is based on the thought that [Unknown A3] we don't get a good supply from the foods
that we eat compared to the nutritional values of the locally grown foods that
we could be eating. According to Marion Nestle, a dietitian, says that
there might be nutritional differences , usually only if your “local” soil is really
great, they wouldn't be that distant. [Unknown A4] According to her, “We're just not
nutrient-deprived.” Another big idea of the locavore movement is the thought of
leaving a significantly smaller carbon footprint by eating the food less traveled.
Yet, there are other “energy-hogging” factors in the production of food. [Unknown A5] (Source C) “But New Zealand lamb is raised on
pastures with a small carbon footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced
under intensive factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint.” With
this, it is seen that the pastures that are local to you, aren't really the best the best place for you to
get food from in terms of the wasted energy. There is also an issue regarding
“food miles”. With certain growers being able to supply more people, further
away, and with a higher supply of food; compared to another grower with the
less amount of produce and miles traveled. “The critical measure here is not
food miles but apples per gallon.” Following those thoughts of locavore
consumers, they don't necessarily know about actually growing food in regard to
processing practices, water availability, packaging waste and fertilizer
application.[Unknown A6]
The largest problem found with the
locavore food industry has to do with our current societies. [Unknown A7] “In the United States, 80 percent of us live in
large, densely-populated urban areas, usually on the coast, and typically
hundreds of miles, from the major centers of food production.” (Source F) How
is it that the world can become relying on just what's near you to get the food
you need to survive, if you don't live near a place of food production?[Unknown A8]
[Unknown A1]Confusing sentence as doesn't shine clarity on the
matter of the locavore movement. Could/ should be written more along the lines
of “ However, there are a few parts to it, that people don't necessarily
realize or think about; as to if and why becoming a locavore could be entirely
beneficial.”
[Unknown A5]Initially didn't see the relevance of this quote
and what it is truly conveying; at this point, I was looking for a good quote to use that shows that local
pastures aren't necessarily wasting less energy.
[Unknown A6]I think that adding more substantial information
into this paragraph would be beneficial to the reader.
[Unknown A7]Really impressed with the use of this quote to use
as a counterclaim to earlier written claims on the locavore movement.
[Unknown A8]Even thought the locavore movement sounds great in
concept., not everyone could participate in it due to their geographical
location. I thought that this was a very important point to dicusss, and am
pleased with ending the essay with it. Also, after reading the entirety of my
essay, I have noticed some unappealing flaws in my writing and words that I
seem to continuously repeat.. One flaw would be not providing a thorough enough
analysis on quotes used and another would be possibly quotes that are too
lengthy. The word “thought” was continuously used throughout the essay, and
even in the comments, which was somewhat annoying.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)